Hannah and Her Sisters Essay Example for Free

Hannah and Her Sisters Essay Relationships in New York are as complex as the city itself. Nothing can be considered as sedentary because of the always changing temperaments of people, development in the place and other factors that contribute to change. It is surprising though that no matter how complex human relationships are; people (in New York) seem not to take it heavily. It may be because of their fast paced lifestyle that they don’t see the heavy impact of certain situations unless it has something to do with career goals. In the movie Hannah and Her Sisters, Woody Allen used comic archetypes to satirize relationships on New York City by exaggerating the kind of intricate relationships and character’s reactions towards situations in a comical way. He showed that people have the tendency not to care how absurd their relationships with others are as long as they maintain their image and keep up with their goals. The story revolved around the intertwined relationships of three sisters with their husbands and exes. To some cultures (other states), the circumstances that the sisters got into may not be dealt as light as they did. To others, the family might condemn the husband if he falls in love with his wife’s sister because it will cause conflicts between the sisters. Woody Allen made the characters in the movie treat the state of affairs in a romantic and funny way. Through the movie, Woody Allen showed that relationships in New York are that complicated however, people generally manage to maintain a positive outlook in life. It is noticeable that in the movie, Allen imposed a happy ending when all of the sisters are happily married.

Privacy Rights :: essays research papers

Privacy Rights   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  The privacy of the individual is the most important right. Without privacy, the democratic system that we know would not exist. Privacy is one of the fundamental values on which our country was founded. There are exceptions to privacy rights that are created by the need for defense and security.   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  When our country was founded, privacy was not an issue. The villages then were small and close. Most people knew their neighbors and what was going on in the community. They did not have drunk drivers, terrorist, or any other threat of changing the way they lived. The transportation that most people had access to were horses. Today there are autos that can be fatal if not controlled. Speed limits and licenses are two examples. The government we have in place maintains and organizes our society.   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  The elements of control are often viewed as violations of privacy. These elements are meant to protect us from irresponsible people and from hurting themselves. The laws that are in place still give privacy without invading personal lives. Privacy is only violated when people feel they are being violated. Jonathan Franzen writes this example of his feelings about privacy.   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã¢â‚¬Å"One of my neighbors in the apartment building across the street spends a lot of time at her mirror examining her pores, and I can see her doing it, just as she can undoubtedly see me sometimes. But our respective privacies remain intact as long as neither of us feels seen.† If people feel comfortable in their surroundings then privacy is not a concern. At other times, people feel violated when they are subject to random searches; this random factor is what other people consider wrong. People feel intruded on when they see a roadblock ahead or a request to see their driver’s license when writing checks. Others are interrupted at dinner by the phone ringing from telemarketers. This selling of information is what the Europeans call data protection. If the data is not kept private, things such as credit card numbers could be stolen over the phone.   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  The privacy in America will forever be changing as technology changes. Cell phones have been a factor in the way people communicates. Automobiles are equipped with TVs and mobile Internet. Privacy is increased, as people communicate less in person. People can spend an entire day in the car and have complete communication with others. Franzen also has this view about transportation.

Jury Nullification Paper Essay

Jury nullification is defined as when juries believe a case is unjust or wrong and may set free a defendant who violated the law. Jury nullification has been an option of a jury in the United States. In the legal system that we use today, jurors have the power to give a non-guilty verdict even when the evidence clearly shows that the defendant is guilty. In cases like this, the jurors decide that the certain laws should not be applied to the particular case or that the laws are unjust for the case. In other cases the jurors may believe that the laws are certainly bias against the defendant to begin with. The 14th amendment in our Constitution promises that all persons no matter race, sex, or religion are allowed due process and equal protection from the law. Today society find it vital to question to what extent a jury may take these laws and make them their own. In this paper it will explain whether ethnicity influences courtroom proceedings and judicial practices, summarize the arg uments for and against ethnicity-based jury nullification, include contemporary examples of ethnicity-based jury nullification and last but not least conclude by choosing a position for or against ethnicity-based jury nullification and defend your decision. A debate that has been going on for some time has always been race-based jury nullification. Jury nullification does have some good point in which it benefits the criminal justice system as it allows the jury to interpret the law and come up with an agreement based on their beliefs. There are reports and statistics that prove discrimination is alive and that a persons race does affect the length and severity of the punishment assigned to him or her. Racial- based nullification can be beneficial in addressing the unfair issues in the criminal justice system. According to the article, Race Based Jury Nullification, it indicated that Jury nullification occurs when a criminal- trial jury refuses to convict a defendant despite proof of guilt because the jurors believe the law is unjust or is being unjustly applied (Rivera). When this method is applied and used in an honest manner, it could possibly to help even out the playing fields for racial based jury nullification for minorities in t he courtroom when it is time for sentencing based on the law rather than on race. Many of the candidates picked to be a part of the jury knows about jury nullification. Anywhere in the world a jury just like a judge can nullify a criminal case. Based on race many of these cases are  nullified even though the evidence proves guilt. For example OJ Simpsons case proved that he was guilty but since the Rodney King incident occurred prior too, he was nullified by the jury. Often times it is not supported because it allows a biased judgment to be formed not based on guilt of the person but based on race. Majority of the times setting criminals free to commit the same crimes again. Being acquitted of all charges is usually how jury nullifications occur. Many believe that racial nullification should be possible for those that have committed non-violent crimes even if the evidence shows that the person is in fact guilty. The contribution to the criminal justice system is that this would allow the prison system to have more space for those that commit more violent crimes regardless of their race. As we see jury nullification can either be beneficial or it can truly destroy the criminal justice system. Courtrooms need to recognize that there needs to be no biases within the system or people need to be blindfolded before being a part of a case. There needs to be a model set forth in regards to the influence that justice should outweigh any feelings in regards to race and one should serve time for the crime that they was convicted of. African American, or Hispanic or minorities races apply society ought to come close to their effort and be aware of its supporting nature and their choice to practice their authority in benefit of their area. In all these cases, the juror should be educated through his or her viewpoint of what is just and unjust. An opinion paper mentioned that all Black Americans should partake in race- based jury nullification and that to do so would bring about changes in how the justice system handled minority cases, (Jemal, 1997). Other valid points are made b y Jemel, supporting his belief in race-based jury nullification by stating The system is designed to put blacks in jail for largely economic crimes while letting child molesters, rapist and murderers go free (1997). After doing all the necessary research, I stand to say that I am against race based nullification. As stated the juror knows what the defendant has done and yet still allows him or her to be acquitted of the crimes because they feel bad for them or the most used their race. These are biased reasons that should not be used when a person is involved with a criminal case. Race nullification either helps or hinders the system and we are always fighting for a better system. The 14th Amendment helps supports my stance by stating  that All persons receive a fair trial by their peers and that can have no effect at all on the decisions made by the jury. The jury is also sworn into the court by swearing on a Bible that they will not only take into consideration the evidence presented by both parties and that they will not allow for any personal feelings or personal bias to get in the way of their vote. Upon reading this paper it provide detailed information about the influence that ethnicity had on courtroom proceeds and judicial practices, the arguments that were for and against race based nullification with contemporary examples. Where I stand on this subject is evident based on my response and I am a firm believer in equality for all. Racism comes in all forms as we can see.

Was Andrew Jackson Democratic Essay - 1200 Words

How democratic was Andrew Jackson? Andrew Jackson was more democratic than not, due to his full support of the lower classes, his desire for new voting laws, and his veto of the banks. Although he was democratic in those ways, he also showed non-democratic qualities in his time in office, including events like the Native American Removal. Since he showed both qualities of a democrat, and a non-democrat, it is not easy to argue a certain side. Andrew Jackson himself, was once a man of the lower class. His family was poor, since his mom was the only provider when he was young. â€Å" His father died a few days before his birth, and Andrew was not an easy child for his mother to raise.† (Background Essay). He would go on to enlist for the†¦show more content†¦By 1836, all of the 12 states were voting by people, except for South Carolina. In Document D, it states how Jackson wants all elections to be elected by people, so that all people living in the United States are having their voice heard. â€Å"Elected offices must be filled directly by the people.† (Document D). Jackson, stating how he thinks it is important for the people to have a say in their government officials. Andrew Jackson also demonstrated democratic qualities through his bank veto message. This was a very important subject at the time, since slave owners were making a great deal of profit. The banks were making a lot of money, and so were the wealthy. Slaves were becoming more and more popular, and if the bank veto had gone the other way, it would have changed the economy at that time. Since slave owners were already making a lot of money, Jackson knew that if he did not veto the bank message, the wealthy people of the country would only become wealthier. â€Å" It is to be regretted that the rich and powerful too often bend the acts of government to their selfish purposes.† (Document F). In Document F, he is explaining that idea of rich people becoming richer, and that the men of the banks cannot be trusted for the sake of the people of the country. In Document G, Daniel Webster states that Jackson’s move only turned the social classes against each other, since he is claiming the wealthy men are only looking to benefit themselves. â€Å" It manifestly seeks toShow MoreRelatedWas Andrew Jackson Democratic Essay874 Words   |  4 PagesWas Andrew Jackson Democratic? Andrew Jackson was the 7th president of the United States. He started out poor and worked his way up. Jackson was in some cases democratic and in others, he was not democratic. Democracy is a government where the people have the power. Jackson was undemocratic when he took over the Native Americans land and got rid of them and when he appointed Samuel Swartout and he end up stealing 1.2 million dollars, however he was democratic when he wanted the free blacks toRead MoreThe Andrew Jackson s War On Against The U.s. Bank848 Words   |  4 PagesThe Purpose of this essay is to discuss the Andrew Jackson Administration. I will first talk about Jackson’s war on against the U.S. Bank. Second, I will talk about the Presidential election of 1824, 1828, and 1832. Third, I will talk about the Indian Removal Act as well as the Trail of Tears. Fourth, the ways in which Jackson expanded the power of the president. Fifth and final, the Nullification Crisis of 1832. The Bank of the United States was technically the second bank of the U.S. since theRead MoreAnalyzing Andrew Jacksons Policies and Presidency659 Words   |  3 Pagesï » ¿Andrew Jacksons Policies and Presidency Andrew Jackson was the seventh president, serving from 1829-1837. Nicknamed Old Hickory, he left an indelible imprint on the nation that extends beyond his face adorning the twenty dollar bill. Jackson split the preexisting Republican Party into the Whig and Democratic Parties, establishing the dual-party structure that exists today. He was the first president who came from a rural, deep Southern background (he was born in the rustic woods of South Carolina)Read MoreThe Time Period Of Late Colonial And Revolutionary America1119 Words   |  5 Pagesindividuals. For example Alexander Hamilton, Frederick Douglas, and Andrew Jackson. Each of those named reigned in their own quarters leaving an influential mark in cultural and political domains. One being one of America’s founding fathers, another being a highly revered social reformer, and lastly one who served as the seventh president of the United States. To be a white man owning a considerable amount of property meant that t heir â€Å"voice† was valid, considerably they had a decision on the direction AmericaRead MoreJames Madison And Andrew Jackson1394 Words   |  6 PagesINTRODUCTION James Madison and Andrew Jackson are some of America’s greatest presidents. They both did great things including being one of the Founding Fathers and being the most famous and well-known war hero of their time. James Madison and Andrew Jackson have many similarities and differences. For example, both of them served time in the military and they also both agreed with the removal of Native Americans. One of their major differences is that James Madison was born into a rich plantationRead MoreFreedom, Liberty, and Independence 1302 Words   |  6 PagesDuring the Jacksonian era, Andrew Jackson and Henry Clay, along with countless other Americans, held strong in their beliefs and the pursuit of their individual rights of freedom, liberty, and independence. The Jacksonian period was a time in American history that has been personified as a time of extreme change and upheaval in the areas of economic growth, political interests, and expansion. It was the tremendous shifts i n these areas that threatened to surpass and exceed the very principles ofRead MoreAndrew Jackson1431 Words   |  6 Pages Andrew Jackson, the seventh president of the United Stated of America, was born on March 15, 1767 and died on June 8, 1845 in Nashville, Tennessee. Jackson’s parents Andrew and Elizabeth Hutchinson Jackson were Presyberitains, Scots-Irish settlers whom in 1765 emigrated from Ireland. Andrew’s birthplace is deduced to have been at one of his uncles houses in the Waxhaw’s area between North Carolina and South Carolina, his exact whereabouts is unknown. Jacksons mother emigrated across the AppalachianRead MoreEssay on Democracy and Jacksonian Democrats817 Words   |  4 Pagesthemselves? AP AM HISTORY DBQ 4 - (An A+ Essays Original Paper, written by Zoo Patrol) Jacksonian Democrats viewed themselves as the guardians of the United States Constitution, political democracy, individual liberty, and equality of economic opportunity. In light of the following documents and your knowledge of the 1820s and the 1830s, to what extent do you agree with the Jacksonians view of themselves. Unlike previous presidents, Andrew Jackson represented the common men. He and his followersRead MoreWhat If Abraham Lincoln Hadnt Died? Essay626 Words   |  3 Pagesno real answers and all we can come with are speculations, in Eric Foner’s essay he seems to address these questions with some acceptable reasons that made me come to the conclusion that if Lincoln hadn’t been assassinated the period of reconstruction would have been better than it was under Johnson. President Andrew Jackson opposed Lincoln’s plan of reconstruction, instead of forgiving the south like Lincoln wanted, Jackson wanted the south to suffer and pay for what it had cause, therefore makingRead MoreThe Birth of Modern Politics1701 Words   |  7 Pagesbook The Birth of Modern Politics Lynn Hudson Parsons claims that the 1828 election was momentous in the history of both political history, as well as our nation. Parsons not only discusses the behind the scenes of the first public election of 1828, but the pivotal events in Andrew Jackson and John Quincy Adams’ lives leading up to the election as well. Parsons succeeds in proving her thesis that the 1828 election was crucial to American politics as we know it today, as well as provoking evidence from